The 2019 Nobel Prize in economics was awarded to three scholars on
the grounds that their pioneering use of randomized control trials (RCTs)
was innovative methodologically and contributed to development policy and
the emergence of a new development economics. Using a critical feminist
lens, this article challenges that conclusion by interrogating the storytelling
practices deployed by “randomista” economists through a critical reading of
a widely cited essay by Esther Duflo, one of the 2019 Nobel recipients, on
the relationship between women’s empowerment and economic development.
The paper argues that the limitations of randomista economics have given
rise to a particular way of thinking characterized by piecemeal analysis, ad
hoc resort to theory, indifference to history and context, and methodological
fundamentalism. It concludes that the randomista argument that broad-based
economic development alone – without focused attention to women’s rights –
will lead to gender equality has not been borne out by recent data